Curious George

Pepin
George
Author

Joanna R. Pepin

Published

August 6, 2026

The next step in my document hunt for my Canadian citizenship by decent application was to find my great grandfather George’s birth record. Riding high from reading 1800s baptism records in cursive French, I thought finding George’s birth record would be so much easier. The 1880 US census record showed the Pepin family living in Chicago when Jules was 13 years old. So, his son George’s record should be in English and with any luck, there might even be a birth certificate/record rather than solely a baptism record.

1880 US Census Record

1880 US Census Record

It turns out, I was over confident and documentation of George’s birth was even more challenging than Jules (George’s dad).

The following is the account of how I eventually found what I needed, but my memory is a bit fuzzy and the strategy was far more circular than this writing will make it appear.

George Pepin, front right

George Pepin, front right

We learned that county clerks in Illinois began recording births in 1877, though these records weren’t mandated by the state until 1916. FamilySearch.org had a few documents for George (e.g., draft card, SSI) noting his birthday as January 5, 1894, so I was hopeful a record existed. I spent a lot of time looking through every possible database and index on FamilySearch that I could find. Some of the IL christening records have already been indexed on FamilySearch as well, but George’s was unfortunately not one of them. A check of the Ancestry website also did not show any sources for his birth record. Eventually, I came to accept that his birth must not have been reported to the government, and I was going to need to hunt for a baptism record again.

Building on the experience with finding Jules’s baptism, it made sense to start by locating the family’s address closest to the date George was born (1894) in order to identify nearby churches. Unfortunately, we were unable to locate an address for the family from the 1890 US Census, likely because it was burned in a fire that destroyed most of these records. So, turning to the 1900 US Census, I could see the family was living at 3928 La Salle St in Chicago.

1900 US Census Record

1900 US Census Record

The Google Map search of Catholic churches nearby the address was a bit confusing. On the one hand, it seemed like a bad sign that the current address appears to be in the middle of I-90. On the other hand, there were a handful of churches nearby. FamilySearch.org has an inventory of records for 200 churches in the Diocese of Chicago, so I started with the three closest churches surrounding the address. The microfiche images of the records are available online. Searching requires clicking through the images, ideally through the index if there is one, or looking at the baptism images for around the date one might expect a baby born in January to have been baptized. I couldn’t find a record in any of these churches, so I repeated the process for all of the other churches on the map that were available in this way.

2026 Google Map of Chicago

2026 Google Map of Chicago

When that didn’t work out, Chris and I decided we needed to replicate what we did for Jules and find a map of old churches. It was possible that the church had closed and that it wasn’t coming up on Google Maps. We discovered that the Archdiocese of Chicago has a downloadable book with maps of Chicago city parishes with dates and ethnicity of the parishes when established. It also compiled a downloadable Excel spreadsheet of the data which makes limiting the 200 parishes a bit easier. This book turned out to be the critical piece of our search, as the church holding the baptism record had indeed closed, but it also sent us hunting in the wrong direction for awhile.

It was a bit difficult to find the La Salle address on the map. Chicago street names and numbering were changed in the early 1900s, and given the home address is a spot on today’s interstate highway, we were estimating the location. Adding to the complication, the address we were looking for was at the bottom/top of the two-page parish map. Our mapped address was located right across Pershing Rd, and the preface of this book stated: “The maps in this guide (not to true scale) are divided into two halves for each set of years that I refer to as upper city and lower city, Pershing Road (3900S) being the dividing line.” So, we weren’t really sure where the house was located across the pages. It was another day or two before we got the house precisely marked on the map.

We filtered the corresponding Excel file to French ethnicity, as this seemed to be a key demographic detail in the description of the churches in this book and on FamilySearch, and it seemed to make sense that we’d be looking for French-speaking churches. We eliminated all churches that were founded after 1894 and then looked at each microfiche collection for churches that seemed reasonably close to our estimated area for the house. This led to nothing.

Locations of Chicago Roman Catholic Churches 1850 - 1990

Locations of Chicago Roman Catholic Churches 1850 - 1990

Since we didn’t have the 1890 US Census, we identified the previous family address as listed in the 1880 US Census and looked at records from the French-speaking churches near that house. This seemed promising because the family had only moved a short distance south on La Salle St in those 20 years, so maybe they weren’t too far away when George was born. Notice on the map that we’ve marked the La Salle St houses just to the left of State St, and that State St appears in different places on the top and bottom page. This led to a lot of confusion for awhile.

Ultimately, this search turned up nothing, too. Then, we looked at French-speaking churches close to the next address we had for the family, as reported in the 1910 US Census. This was the address my family remembers, a tiny house located on Carpenter St further south on the map, near train tracks. We hypothesized that the family may have moved to this neighborhood because they already had a community there. This too was fruitless.

When all of that led to a dead end, we tried to find neighborhoods where French Canadians landed in Chicago. These appeared to be somewhat nearby but west of the La Salle addresses. We knew from the census records that George’s mom was Polish, so we briefly tried to find Polish churches, but they were not well labeled in our research documents. A search of all these church records also turned up nothing.

At some point in this search, we found a newspaper article documenting Jules and Mary’s (George’s parents) 50th wedding anniversary. The anniversary was noted in the Chicago Daily News as a milestone event because they were the first known deaf couple in the area to reach their golden anniversary (more on that another time!). I had known at some point, but had forgotten learning that my grandfather’s grandparents were deaf. Suddenly, the search for French-speaking churches seemed a bit silly. So, off we went looking for historical churches for the deaf. This was also leading to dead ends, as many of these records were not available online, but it was starting to feel like an explanation for why we couldn’t find a baptism record. Still, without strong evidence that was the reason, I kept searching.

We searched church records at all the French churches nearby the addresses located in the newspaper article (their current church and previous church). I also found a written memory from my grandfather of a Chicago church he attended as a child. The records from that church also failed to turn up anything notable.

Finally, we decided to find exactly where on the parish map the 1900 La Salle address was and work from proximity, ignoring the listed ethnicity of the churches. The closest church, #31, was Irish church St. Gabriel, which we had already ruled out in the initial search of currently active churches. Church #40 was St. Cecilia, listed as an Irish church, and church #131 was St. George (would have been ironic!) listed as a German church. Late into the evening, when I should have been heading to bed, I finally found George Pepin at the top of the page of the microfiche for St. Cecilia!

Peppin, George

Peppin, George

We clicked through the microfishe until we found his baptism record. Unlike Jules’ record, which was in paragraph form, this one was a single line entry. Importantly, it had all the pertinent information, linking George to Jules.

George baptism record

George baptism record

It lists his birth date as January 11, 1894 and his baptism took place on January 21st, 1894. This was a bit surprising, because the other documentation available for George (draft card, SSI, tombstone) all list his birthdate as January 5th. It’s a mystery if the date got recorded incorrectly or if somewhere along the way, it got mis-remembered.

The saga continues: At the time, this document was enough to submit my application for Canadian citizenship, linking Jules and George. I included copies of both these pages, the front page of the record book, and the direct url link to the record on FamilySearch. Since then, Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) has updated their application instructions, and now require records from the “original” source authority.

This means, the rest of my family likely needs a certified copy of this record to apply for Canadian citizenship. To get it, the archive holding this record requires family members provide certified copies of birth and death certificates for anyone between the person making the request and the person whose record is requested (George). Meaning, we need my grandfather’s birth and death certificate before my dad (or his siblings) can request George’s baptism record. We have a copy of my grandfather’s death record and we’re now waiting on Illinois to provide us with a copy of Gene’s birth certificate. (I submitted with an archived copy of Gene’s birth certificate, but my family will need this certified copy as well.)

It is possible that IRCC would accept the US Census records linking Jules, George, and Gene and use George’s baptism record as substantiating evidence, but no one know for sure at this time what is considered sufficient evidence.

Get new posts delivered to your inbox.


Comments

Comments are moderated and may not appear immediately.